Skip to main content

Darlington v. General Electric

Citations

  • 504 A.2d 306
  • 350 Pa. Super. 183
  • 2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1666
  • 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that additional consideration may be sufficient when individual must move his family to commence a new employment position
  • indicating that additional consideration may be sufficient when individual must move his family to commence a new employment position
  • [determining that] no public policy exception to at-will employment doctrine found even though employee was discharged unfairly in that he was not afforded the opportunity to defend himself against allegations of accounting irregularities
  • tracing recognition of employment at-will doctrine in Pennsylvania to Henry v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R.R. Co., 139 Pa. 289, 21 A. 157 (1891)
  • tracing recognition of employment at-will doctrine in Pennsylvania to Henry v. Pittsburg & Lake Erie R.R. Co., 139 Pa. 289, 21 A. 157 (1891)
  • tracing recognition of employment at-will doctrine in Pennsylvania to Henry v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R.R. Co., 139 Pa. 289, 21 A. 157 (1891)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh, Beck, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

123 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.