Skip to main content
· 1/18/1991

Yetterant v. Ward Trucking Corp.

Citations

  • 585 A.2d 1022
  • 401 Pa. Super. 467
  • 6 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 146
  • 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 80

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding allegation of specific intent to harm fails to state cause of action for wrongful discharge under Pennsylvania law
  • finding that “to survive a challenge of failure to state a cause of action, complaint must establish violation of a public policy”
  • absolute privilege of statements made by employer in termination letter are abused and, thereby, lost only when the employer publishes the defamatory material to unauthorized parties
  • “the Clay and Paul cases ... clearly hold that the only exception to the employment at-will doctrine is where the discharge violates clear mandates of public policy”
  • exception recognized in \only the most limited of circumstances\
  • exception recognized in “only the most limited of circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Montemuro, Tamilia and Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.