· 1/18/1991
Yetterant v. Ward Trucking Corp.
Citations
- 585 A.2d 1022
- 401 Pa. Super. 467
- 6 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 146
- 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 80
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding allegation of specific intent to harm fails to state cause of action for wrongful discharge under Pennsylvania law
- finding that “to survive a challenge of failure to state a cause of action, complaint must establish violation of a public policy”
- absolute privilege of statements made by employer in termination letter are abused and, thereby, lost only when the employer publishes the defamatory material to unauthorized parties
- “the Clay and Paul cases ... clearly hold that the only exception to the employment at-will doctrine is where the discharge violates clear mandates of public policy”
- exception recognized in \only the most limited of circumstances\
- exception recognized in “only the most limited of circumstances”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Montemuro, Tamilia and Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.