Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 3/22/1993

Krajsa v. Keypunch, Inc.

Citations

622 A.2d 355
424 Pa. Super. 230
8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1816
1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 952

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that after Clay and Paul, a complaint must clearly establish a violation of public policy in order to bring a claim for wrongful discharge
holding that the Whistleblower Law is to protect governmental employees but does not create a public policy in favor of employees discharged from non-governmental entities.
stating \we are not prepared to expand the coverage of the act....\
“an at will employee may be terminated for good reason, bad reason, or no reason at all”
“an at will employee may be terminated for good reason, bad reason, or no reason at all”
“an at will employee may be terminated for good reason, bad reason, or no reason at all”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McEwen, Popovich, Brosky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

70 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Krajsa v. Keypunch, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Krajsa v. Keypunch Inc.
Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 1992-06-10

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.