Skip to main content
· 5/9/1985

Woolley v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.

Citations

  • 491 A.2d 1257
  • 99 N.J. 284
  • 1 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 995
  • 1985 N.J. LEXIS 2330
  • 119 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2380

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that implied promises contained within employee manuals that employees cannot be fired without cause may be enforceable
  • holding that absent a clear disclaimer, an implied promise contained in employment manual that an employee will be fired only for cause may be enforceable against an employer even when employment is for an indefinite term and would otherwise be terminable at will
  • reasoning that reliance on a clear promise in a handbook is presumed
  • establishing grounds for finding implied contract in context of at-will employment relationship
  • a variety of unforeseen business and economic conditions that can and do arise, require the ability to adapt to prospective needs
  • a variety of unforeseen business and economic conditions that can and do arise, require the ability to adapt to prospective needs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilentz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.