Finkelstein v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This Court will not re-weigh the evidence considered by the trial court, nor will we disturb the trial court’s determination of credibility of the witnesses.”
• “This Court will not re-weigh the evidence considered by the trial court, nor will we disturb the trial court’s determination of credibility of the witnesses.”
• “Any challenge to the legality of the search and seizure of Petitioner is separate from the determination of immunity under section 776.032, Florida Statutes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kelvin J. Mack v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-10-30
• Pierce Nelson Hoempler v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-03-26
• State of Florida v. Alejandro Argerich
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-04-02
• Storey Mountain, LLC A/A/O First Horizon Bank v. ASHCO, Inc., PI Proprietors, LLC, Lock W. Ireland, and Florida Bank of Jacksonville
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-10-03

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mederos v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-08-10· cited 33×
• Hair v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-08-19· cited 17×
• Darling v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-29· cited 16×
• Clinton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-10-13· cited 6×
• Lynch v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-27· cited 4×
• Silas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-10-23· cited 2×