Skip to main content

Peterson v. State

Citations

  • 983 So. 2d 27
  • 2008 WL 1805499

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court may not deny a pretrial motion for immunity simply because factual disputes exist
  • noting that petitioner could still raise immunity issue as affirmative defense at trial
  • trial court must weigh the factual disputes and may not deny a motion simply because those disputes exist
  • “[W]hen immunity under this law is properly raised by a defendant, the trial court must decide the matter by confronting and weighing only factual disputes.”
  • “[T]he trial court must determine whether the defendant has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the immunity attaches.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kahn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.