DaBronzo v. Roche Vitamins, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the court determined that the thirty-year span of employment of an asbestos-removal worker indicated that he was more readily classifiable as an employee than as an independent contractor
• where the court concluded under Factor 3 that the removal of asbestos was a specialized job skill possessed by the employees of an independent contractor and not by the employees of a vitamin manufacturer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).