Skip to main content
· 5/13/1996

Barratt v. Cushman & Wakefield of New Jersey, Inc.

Citations

  • 675 A.2d 1094
  • 144 N.J. 120
  • 11 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1172
  • 1996 N.J. LEXIS 612

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that CEPA is remedial legislation intended “to protect employees who report illegal or unethical work-place activities”
  • noting that CEPA is a codification of the Supreme Court's ruling in Pierce
  • discussing Pierce, supra, 84 N.J. at 72, 417 A. 2d 505
  • “[C]ourts should construe CEPA liberally to achieve its remedial purpose.”
  • discussing Pierce, supra, 84 N.J. at 72, 417 A.2d 505
  • \[C]ourts should construe CEPA liberally to 13 achieve its remedial purpose.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pollock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.