N.D. Indiana· 3/25/2008
In re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
Citations
- 273 F.R.D. 424
- 2008 WL 7764456
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- specifically rejecting the argument that Trezvant prohibits wage class actions under New Hampshire law, and holding that § 275:53 permits such actions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Anfinson v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-12-20· cited 30×
- Reginald Gray v. FedEx Ground Package SystemEighth Circuit· 2015-08-21· cited 13×
- Costello v. Beavex Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2014-03-31· cited 13×
- Laumann v. National Hockey LeagueS.D. New York· 2015-05-14· cited 11×
- Teoba v. Trugreen Landcare LLCW.D. New York· 2011-02-15· cited 6×
- Wells v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.E.D. Missouri· 2013-09-27· cited 6×
- Carroll v. KampsN.D. Indiana· 2011-06-13· cited 3×
- Anfinson v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEMCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-12-20· cited 3×
- Alfred v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.C.D. California· 2017-04-11· cited 3×
- Bolden v. Walsh GroupN.D. Illinois· 2012-03-30· cited 1×
- Cox v. Sherman Capital LLCS.D. Indiana· 2013-08-08
Cites
213 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court· 1974-01-15· cited 3,578×
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 3,301×
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court· 1992-03-24· cited 1,334×
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 1,115×
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyFifth Circuit· 1996-05-23· cited 871×
- Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri· 2003-12-09· cited 679×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1975-02-25· cited 621×
- Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.Fifth Circuit· 1998-10-02· cited 578×
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Third Circuit· 1977-07-21· cited 553×
- John D. Szabo, Doing Business as Zatron v. Bridgeport MacHines Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2001-05-04· cited 519×
- Unnamed caseSecond Circuit· 2001-10-17· cited 451×
- Pedro De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Marcelino Vasquez and Albert Solis, DefendantsSeventh Circuit· 1983-09-19· cited 404×
- Retired Chicago Police Ass'n v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 1993-10-12· cited 393×
- Karen L. Keele, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Norman Paul Wexler, Mitchell Wexler and Wexler and WexlerSeventh Circuit· 1998-07-06· cited 347×
- Rosario v. LivaditisSeventh Circuit· 1992-05-13· cited 340×
- S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-03-23· cited 309×
- Limestone Products Distribution, Inc. v. McNamaraTexas Supreme Court· 2002-04-25· cited 307×
- Robidoux v. CelaniSecond Circuit· 1993-03-10· cited 299×
- GKN Co. v. MagnessIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-03-13· cited 241×
Other cases named In re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
7 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.N.D. Indiana· 2010-08-11· cited 13×
- In re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.N.D. Indiana· 2012-04-24· cited 4×
- in Re FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-02-22
- in Re FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-02-22
- in Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-05-07
- in Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-05-07
- In re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.N.D. Indiana· 2010-03-30
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.