· 6/10/1998
Pukowsky v. Caruso
Citations
- 711 A.2d 398
- 312 N.J. Super. 171
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- accepting that where the “defendant had no input at all into what skills she could use” on the job, the third factor did not weigh against defendant.
- finding that although neither the LAD nor its legislative history do not specifically list sexual harassment as a form of discrimination, there is no doubt that the act forbids such conduct in the workplace
- listing 12 factors that courts should consider to determine a worker’s status
- “The LAD is a broad and pervasive statute, which was intended by the Legislature to be liberally construed . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Stern, Kleiner and Kimmelman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.