Skip to main content
· 6/10/1998

Pukowsky v. Caruso

Citations

  • 711 A.2d 398
  • 312 N.J. Super. 171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • accepting that where the “defendant had no input at all into what skills she could use” on the job, the third factor did not weigh against defendant.
  • finding that although neither the LAD nor its legislative history do not specifically list sexual harassment as a form of discrimination, there is no doubt that the act forbids such conduct in the workplace
  • listing 12 factors that courts should consider to determine a worker’s status
  • “The LAD is a broad and pervasive statute, which was intended by the Legislature to be liberally construed . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Stern, Kleiner and Kimmelman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.