Cummings v. Standard Register Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “whatever shortcomings existed in [the expert's] calculations went to the weight, not the admissibility, of the testimony”
• noting that even when a federal court adjudicates state law claims, “postjudgment interest . . . is governed by federal law”
• affirming the district court’s decision to allow a damages expert to testify where the expert’s assumptions were those made by similar experts “with some frequency”
• upholding an award of front pay until the plaintiff’s estimated retirement age when the plaintiff was a seventeen-year employee of the defendant
• affirming admission of damage expert's testimony given the expert's assumptions were also made by similar experts \with some frequency\
• describing the testimony of a former employee who had filed an age discrimination complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, but later settled his case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).