Skip to main content
· 3/30/1992

Charles M. Thibeault v. Square D Company

Citations

  • 960 F.2d 239
  • 22 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1355
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 5514
  • 1992 WL 59262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that totality of ___ circumstances for sanction purposes could include events in other litigation
  • affirming the trial court’s preclusion at trial of plaintiffs expert testimony for failure to supplement interrogatories concerning expert’s proposed testimony
  • noting potential for prejudice to opposing counsel in “an eleventh-hour change in a party’s theory of the case”
  • “While 14 the introduction of expert testimony ‘on the eve of trial’ could warrant preclusion, the 15 deposition surprises here were hardly the sort of ‘eleventh-hour’ changes that could be 16 considered ‘harmful.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Aldrich, Bownes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.