Skip to main content

Cromartie v. State

Citations

  • 514 S.E.2d 205
  • 270 Ga. 780
  • 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 965
  • 1999 Ga. LEXIS 262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The standard for excusing a prospective juror based upon the prospective juror’s views on the death penalty draws no religious or secular distinction.”
  • \The standard for excusing a prospective juror based upon the prospective juror's views on the death penalty draws no religious or secular distinction.\
  • visual comparison of shoe imprints is not scientific evidence subject to Harper v. State analysis
  • visual comparison of shoe imprints is not scientific evidence subject to Harper v. State analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein, Fletcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Cromartie v. State

23 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.