Cromartie v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence of decedent’s blood alcohol level was relevant and especially important given that it was the only evidence besides defendant’s testimony that supported his claim of self-defense
• “Particularly because Mr. Cromartie’s testimony. . . [was] not corroborated by other witnesses, evidence of the victim’s intoxication could have been critical in bolstering his theory of defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jennings
  Washington Supreme Court· 2022-02-03· cited 36×
• State v. David
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2020-09-30

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McCray v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-26· cited 43×
• Washington v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-27· cited 32×
• Zamora v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-07-20· cited 28×
• Steiger v. MASSACHUSETTS CASUALTY INS.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-02-12· cited 16×
• Sluyter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-20· cited 4×