Skip to main content

Miller v. State

Citations

  • 571 S.E.2d 788
  • 275 Ga. 730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when evidence shows that a defendant’s battered victim has suffered a severe injury to his brain, resulting in the loss of normal brain functioning, victim has suffered an aggravated battery
  • holding that when “a battered victim has suffered a severe injury to [his] brain, resulting in the loss of normal brain functioning, [he is] said to have been ‘deprived of [his] brain,’ thus suffering an aggravated battery”
  • “the evidence introduced at trial . . . , was sufficient to enable rational triers of fact to find appellant guilty”
  • excusal of 15.2% of prospective jurors due to exposure to pretrial publicity insufficient to require change of venue
  • defendant moved for continuance due to recent local and national media coverage on other youth crimes, which motion was denied
  • defendant moved for continuance due to recent local and national media coverage on other youth crimes, which motion was denied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sears, Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.