Skip to main content

Prewitt v. State

Citations

  • 761 N.E.2d 862
  • 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 18
  • 2002 WL 44268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting evidence of a prior drug transaction because it showed the defendant’s intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb, Kirsch, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.