Washington Supreme Court· 11/29/2018
Cornwell v. Microsoft Corp.
Citations
- 430 P.3d 229
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that both an initial reduction in guaranteed monthly base salary and a later termination could independently qualify as adverse actions
- “When evaluating the merits of cases brought under WLAD, we employ the 5 McDonnell Douglas.”
- to prove the causal element, a plaintiff must show that 3 retaliation was a “substantial factor” motivating the employer’s adverse action
- to prove 6 the causal element, a plaintiff must show that retaliation was a “substantial factor” motivating the 7 employer’s adverse action
- a 8 plaintiff may rely on the fact that “the employer had knowledge of the action” as 9 evidence of discrimination sufficient to survive summary judgment.
- “At the summary judgment stage, the plaintiff’s burden is one of production, not persuasion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wiggins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Washington v. Douglas Virgil ArbogastCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2020-12-24· cited 6×
- State v. ArbogastWashington Supreme Court· 2022-03-31· cited 5×
- Lori Mackey v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2020-03-03
- Blue Ribbon Farms Property Owners' Association, V. Michael & Marilyn MasonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2024-04-30
- State v. City of SunnysideWashington Supreme Court· 2024-06-20
- Thomas E. Bittner, V. Symetra Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2024-10-28
- Ezequiel Apolo-albino, V. State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2023-07-31
- Verduzco v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2026-06-11
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 3,700×
- William J. Ray v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster GeneralNinth Circuit· 2000-07-07· cited 707×
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GuerraSupreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 662×
- Elizabeth Gordon v. New York City Board of EducationSecond Circuit· 2000-11-03· cited 658×
- Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 536×
- Richard Kessler v. Westchester County Department of Social Services and Westchester County, Docket No. 05-2582-CvSecond Circuit· 2006-08-23· cited 499×
- Muller v. OregonSupreme Court· 1908-02-24· cited 342×
- Grimwood v. University of Puget Sound, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1988-04-14· cited 319×
- Godofredo Hernandez v. Spacelabs Medical Inc., a Delaware CorporationNinth Circuit· 2003-09-11· cited 297×
- Nada Raad v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictNinth Circuit· 2003-05-08· cited 263×
- Stephens v. EricksonSeventh Circuit· 2009-06-30· cited 247×
- Wilmot v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 237×
- Scrivener v. Clark CollegeWashington Supreme Court· 2014-09-18· cited 204×
- Deborah RANEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VINSON GUARD SERVICE, INC., Defendant-AppelleeEleventh Circuit· 1997-08-29· cited 186×
- Allison v. Housing Authority of City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 162×
- Robert B. Reich, U.S. Secretary of Labor v. Hoy Shoe Company, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1994-08-12· cited 88×
- Estevez v. Faculty Club of the University of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-03-28· cited 51×
- Boyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-02-03· cited 43×
- Currier v. Northland Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-08-04· cited 41×
Other cases named Cornwell v. Microsoft Corp.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.