Skip to main content

Cornwell v. Microsoft Corp.

Citations

  • 430 P.3d 229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that both an initial reduction in guaranteed monthly base salary and a later termination could independently qualify as adverse actions
  • “When evaluating the merits of cases brought under WLAD, we employ the 5 McDonnell Douglas.”
  • to prove the causal element, a plaintiff must show that 3 retaliation was a “substantial factor” motivating the employer’s adverse action
  • to prove 6 the causal element, a plaintiff must show that retaliation was a “substantial factor” motivating the 7 employer’s adverse action
  • a 8 plaintiff may rely on the fact that “the employer had knowledge of the action” as 9 evidence of discrimination sufficient to survive summary judgment.
  • “At the summary judgment stage, the plaintiff’s burden is one of production, not persuasion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Cornwell v. Microsoft Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.