Skip to main content
· 8/29/1997

Deborah RANEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VINSON GUARD SERVICE, INC., Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 120 F.3d 1192
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 22844
  • 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,976
  • 74 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1883
  • 1997 WL 471359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an employee functioning as \a facilitator or conduit only\ is not a true decisionmaker
  • holding that a plaintiff’s assertions, based upon no more than unsupported hunches, were not sufficient to defeat defendant’s motion for summary judgment
  • upholding a grant of summary judgment where a company vice-president without knowledge of the protected expression denied that a regional branch manager with such knowledge terminated the plaintiff, and where the plaintiff failed to establish the branch manager’s authority
  • “Summary judgment cannot be avoided . . . based on hunches unsupported with significant probative evidence.”
  • “Summary judgment cannot be avoided . . . based on hunches unsupported with significant probative evidence.”
  • “It is not enough for the plaintiff to show that someone in the organization knew of the protected expression ... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hatchett, Birch, Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.