· 1/14/1998
Sakeagak v. State
Citations
- 952 P.2d 278
- 1998 WL 4438
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- expressing particular danger when a law enforcement officer testifies about a defendant’s guilt because jurors may assume that police know more information than was presented in court, and jurors may credit their experience
- expressing particular danger when a law enforcement officer testifies about a defendant’s guilt because jurors may assume that police know more information than was presented in court, and jurors may credit their experience
- an appellate court is to affirm a sentencing decision unless the decision is clearly mistaken
- trial court's evidentiary rulings reviewed for abuse of discretion
- trial court's evidentiary rulings reviewed for abuse of discretion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coats, Mannheimer, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.