Skip to main content
· 1/14/1998

Sakeagak v. State

Citations

  • 952 P.2d 278
  • 1998 WL 4438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • expressing particular danger when a law enforcement officer testifies about a defendant’s guilt because jurors may assume that police know more information than was presented in court, and jurors may credit their experience
  • expressing particular danger when a law enforcement officer testifies about a defendant’s guilt because jurors may assume that police know more information than was presented in court, and jurors may credit their experience
  • an appellate court is to affirm a sentencing decision unless the decision is clearly mistaken
  • trial court's evidentiary rulings reviewed for abuse of discretion
  • trial court's evidentiary rulings reviewed for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coats, Mannheimer, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.