Court of Appeals of Maryland· 8/22/2012
Corbin v. State
Citations
- 428 Md. 488
- 52 A.3d 946
- 2012 Md. LEXIS 476
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant did not have an expectation of privacy in a cup he “voluntarily discarded” on the floor of his jail cell, because he “could not reasonably expect that the police would not collect, and potentially investigate, the trash he discarded in his cell”
- upholding the decision of the Maryland State Board of Physicians to fine and suspend a physician who failed to disclose on his renewal application that he had been sued for malpractice
- “[Probationers do not enjoy the same liberty rights as other citizens and have fewer legitimate expectations about privacy than law-abiding citizens.”
- “[W]e review the ultimate question of constitutionality de novo[.]” (Citation omitted)
- “[W]e review the ultimate question of constitutionality de novo[.]” (Citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Adkins, Battaglia, Greene
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Doe v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-03-04· cited 77×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-07-08· cited 36×
- Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-12· cited 35×
- Raynor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-27· cited 30×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-05-28· cited 21×
- McCree v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-12-18· cited 10×
- Moats v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-10-25· cited 7×
- State v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-07-28· cited 7×
- Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-12· cited 6×
- Hall, Cummings, Lubin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-06-28· cited 6×
- State v. CallahanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-01-23· cited 3×
- Freilich v. Upper Chesapeake Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-12-19· cited 1×
- Howard v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-04-24
- Borges v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-08-01
- Booker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-08-28
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 2,560×
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 2,149×
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 2,025×
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court· 2001-12-10· cited 1,478×
- United States v. Nicholas Omar MidgetteFourth Circuit· 2007-02-26· cited 1,370×
- Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 982×
- United States v. John Michael PerkinsFourth Circuit· 2004-04-07· cited 225×
- State v. AlbrechtCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-10-21· cited 213×
- United States v. MitchellThird Circuit· 2011-07-25· cited 106×
- United States v. Karen H. Amerson, United States of America v. Julius GravesSecond Circuit· 2007-04-04· cited 96×
- United States v. WeikertFirst Circuit· 2007-08-09· cited 91×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-07-23· cited 91×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-06-14· cited 66×
- State v. RainesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-08-26· cited 50×
- Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. SavilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-03-23· cited 49×
- United States v. Charles Layton CoxSeventh Circuit· 1970-07-01· cited 48×
- United States v. Jeremy D. HagenowSeventh Circuit· 2005-08-31· cited 46×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.