Skip to main content

Walker v. State

Citations

  • 432 Md. 587
  • 69 A.3d 1066
  • 2013 WL 3456566
  • 2013 Md. LEXIS 459

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the context in which a male paraeducator wrote notes to an elementary school student “certainly informs the interpretation” of the notes
  • explaining that the context in which a male paraeducator wrote notes to an elementary school student “certainly informs the interpretation” of the notes
  • describing the rule as an aid to resolving an ambiguity in a criminal statute
  • “We begin with a presumption that the statute is constitutional, and the burden rests on Petitioner to show why that is not the case.”
  • an adult who passed notes to a child in class exploited her sexually because “the context and the content” of the notes was sexual and the adult “received a benefit” − sexual or romantic pleasure − from the notes
  • an adult who passed notes to a child in class exploited her sexually because “the context and the content” of the notes was sexual and the adult “received a benefit” — sexual or romantic pleasure — from the notes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbera, McDonald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.