Third Circuit· 7/25/2011

United States v. Mitchell

Citations

652 F.3d 387
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 15272
2011 WL 3086952

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that “DNA profiles . . . function as ‘genetic fingerprints’ used only for identification purposes”
weighing the \minimal\ intru- sion of privacy caused by DNA sample collection by blood test
discussing the process of creating a DNA profile for CODIS and the use of “junk” DNA, the federal DNA act and the levels of database that contribute to CODIS
discussing the process of creating a DNA profile for CODIS and the use of \junk\ DNA, the federal DNA act and the levels of database that contribute to CODIS
addressing both as-applied and facial challenges when there was ambiguity about which challenge defendant mounted
weighing the “minimal” intrusion of privacy caused by DNA sample collection by blood test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKee, Sloviter, Scirica, Rendell, Barry, Ambro, Fuentes, Smith, Fisher, Chagares, Jordan, Hardiman, Greenaway, Vanaskie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

96 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.