Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 223 Md. App. 128
  • 115 A.3d 668
  • 2015 Md. App. LEXIS 68

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, by hitting someone who unintentionally spit on her, the defendant used “unreasonable and excessive” force and failed to satisfy the fourth factor of the self-defense test
  • concluding that, by hitting someone who unintentionally spit on her, the defendant used “unreasonable and excessive” force and failed to satisfy the fourth factor of the self-defense test
  • noting that “it is 29 well-established that a trial court is strongly encouraged to use the pattern jury instructions.”
  • explaining that Maryland appellate courts strongly favor the trial court’s use of pattern jury instructions
  • “it is well- established that a trial court is strongly encouraged to use the pattern jury instructions”
  • \it is well-established that a trial court is strongly encouraged to use the pattern jury instructions\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meredith, Woodward, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.