Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1/6/1978
Cook v. State
Citations
- 381 A.2d 671
- 281 Md. 665
- 1978 Md. LEXIS 343
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]t is widely agreed that exclusionary orders resemble mere evidentiary rulings, interlocutory in nature and hence are intrinsically non-final.” Id. at 670, 381 A.2d 671
- “It is beyond question that the closely related doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel apply to criminal as well as civil causes.”
- differentiating collateral estoppel from the related doctrine of res judicata
- “Appellant alleges no double jeopardy violation in the present case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge, Orth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Batson v. ShiflettCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-03-12· cited 236×
- Colandrea v. Wilde Lake Community Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-11-08· cited 149×
- Commonwealth v. ScalaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-04-30· cited 70×
- MacKall v. Zayre Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-03-29· cited 68×
- Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-06-09· cited 66×
- Parrott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-11-02· cited 57×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-11-12· cited 56×
- Rowland v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-08-01· cited 53×
- Powers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-06-01· cited 53×
- Powell v. BreslinCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-01-18· cited 44×
- Bowling v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-02-02· cited 43×
- State v. BoozerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-10-01· cited 41×
- Cassidy v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-05-05· cited 38×
- Ball v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-02-02· cited 33×
- Ferrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-01-09· cited 33×
- Long v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-11-07· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-03-16· cited 27×
- Gibson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-12-14· cited 26×
- Butler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-27· cited 24×
- Singer v. Steven Kokes, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1978-04-12· cited 22×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court· 1976-03-08· cited 1,492×
- Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-04-21· cited 977×
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-03-19· cited 657×
- Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-06-13· cited 449×
- United States v. OppenheimerSupreme Court· 1916-12-04· cited 417×
- Cogen v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1929-01-02· cited 260×
- McGrath v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals· 1975-04-01· cited 120×
- MPC, Inc. v. KennyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-01-04· cited 107×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-03-08· cited 104×
- People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court· 1972-01-27· cited 97×
- People v. BracamonteCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-10-07· cited 81×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Leo Anthony Digiangiemo v. Paul J. Regan, Commissioner, New York State Division of ParoleSecond Circuit· 1975-12-29· cited 79×
- Neal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-09-01· cited 72×
- Cousins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-04-08· cited 71×
- Jourdan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-07-09· cited 70×
- Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. TKU AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-07-15· cited 66×
- Lohss and Sprenkle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-06-27· cited 59×
- Robert Watts v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1968-09-25· cited 49×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.