Skip to main content

Lohss and Sprenkle v. State

Citations

  • 321 A.2d 534
  • 272 Md. 113
  • 1974 Md. LEXIS 769

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, prior to enactment of CJ 12-302(c)(3), that State had no right to appeal decision to grant a motion to suppress evidence
  • stating generally that, “when a party has the option of objecting, his failure to do so while it is still within the power of the trial court to correct the error is regarded as a waiver estopping him from obtaining a review of the point or question on appeal” (emphasis added)
  • party who fails to object when trial court still has power to correct error cannot complain on appeal
  • State may not appeal dismissal which it sought or to which it consented
  • State may not appeal dismissal which it sought or to which it consented
  • state has no right of appeal from granting of motion to suppress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Singley, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge, O'Donnell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.