Court of Appeals of Maryland· 6/27/1994
Butler v. State
Citations
- 643 A.2d 389
- 335 Md. 238
- 1994 Md. LEXIS 85
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that guilty knowledge “can be inferred from all the surrounding facts and circumstances in the case”
- stating that, “[although collateral estoppel is usually invoked based upon a prior acquittal, the critical consideration is whether an issue of ultimate fact has been previously determined in favor of the defendant” (internal citations omitted)
- “The term ‘knowledge’ means that at that time the relief or assistance was given the defendant must have had actual knowledge that the person assisted was the one who committed the felony.”
- motion to dismiss criminal case on ground of collateral estoppel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eldridge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Manikhi v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-08-24· cited 108×
- Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-06-09· cited 66×
- State v. GriffithsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-16· cited 54×
- Galloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-10-11· cited 32×
- State v. WoodsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-05-17· cited 31×
- Odum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-02-23· cited 29×
- Owens Corning v. WalatkaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-02-25· cited 25×
- West v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-12-03· cited 23×
- Green v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-09-03· cited 22×
- State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-08-25· cited 20×
- Higginbotham v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-03-29· cited 12×
- Buckley v. Brethren Mutual InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-09-26· cited 12×
- Cunningham v. Baltimore Cnty.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-07-01· cited 9×
- Tyler v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-30· cited 8×
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-10-28· cited 4×
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. CarterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-29· cited 3×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-06-30
- Jennings & Turner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2026-02-26
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-01-17· cited 1,616×
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-01-28· cited 949×
- Sealfon v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-01-12· cited 555×
- Starr v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1894-05-14· cited 307×
- Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-06-10· cited 157×
- State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-04-13· cited 132×
- Turner v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 128×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-12-09· cited 107×
- Delo v. NewlonSupreme Court· 1990-06-28· cited 95×
- Simpson v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 91×
- Tyler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-04-26· cited 70×
- Cook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-01-06· cited 69×
- People v. AcevedoNew York Court of Appeals· 1987-05-05· cited 68×
- United States v. Kenneth Clark and Eric RomandiSecond Circuit· 1979-12-28· cited 57×
- Powers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-06-01· cited 53×
- Eiland v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-10-08· cited 50×
- United States v. Angelo SeijoSecond Circuit· 1976-06-24· cited 49×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.