Skip to main content

Farris v. State

Citations

  • 818 N.E.2d 63
  • 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 2293
  • 2004 WL 2650151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court's exclusion of a witness was erroneous, but the error was harmless
  • holding that although the trial court abused its discretion in excluding Meeks from testifying, such error was harmless because the evidence presented against the defendant was strong, and the accounts were supported ■by a surveillance video
  • noting that the eyewitness accounts of the robbery were supported by the gas station’s surveillance video
  • noting that the eyewitness accounts of the robbery were supported by the gas station’s surveillance video
  • noting that the eyewitness accounts of the robbery were supported by the gas station’s surveillance video
  • finding exclusion of potential witness harmless where there was uncertainty about what witness would testify about and where evidence against defendant was otherwise strong

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb, Kirsch, Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.