Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Indiana Supreme Court· 6/17/2005

Conner v. State

Citations

  • 829 N.E.2d 21
  • 2005 WL 1415407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the petitioner’s post-conviction claim “of trial court bias was not raised at trial or in [the petitioner’s] earlier appeal, and [was] therefore procedurally defaulted”
  • holding that to the extent the petitioner’s present claim is the same as raised before, the claim was decided adverse to the petitioner and is barred by the doctrine of res judicata
  • holding that where petitioner made no argument that his claim was not known or available to him in prior proceedings, his claim that he could present claim of fundamental error in successive post-conviction petition was “simply wrong.”
  • holding that where petitioner made no claim that his claim was not known or available to him in prior proceedings, his claim that he could present claim of fundamental error in successive post-conviction petition was “simply wrong.”
  • holding that where petitioner made no claim that his claim was not known or available to him in prior proceedings, his claim that he could present claim of fundamental error in successive post-conviction petition was “simply wrong.”
  • noting that to the extent a claim is the same as has been raised before and decided adversely, it is barred by the doctrine of res judicata

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.