Kevin A. Conner v. Daniel McBride Superintendent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that such arguments come down to a matter of degrees, which are ill-suited to judicial second-guessing
• concluding Conner had failed to demonstrate that the jury would not have convicted him of murder even if an instruction on sudden heat had been given
• noting that such arguments come down to a matter of degrees, which are ill-suited to judicial second-guessing
• considering, under the totality test, the reliability of a confession to support a conclusion that the confession was voluntary
• considering, under the totality test, the reliability of a confession to support a conclusion that the confession was voluntary
• internal 2Recall that Abt raised only one claim on his direct appeal: that he should have been allowed to withdraw his plea because he was “confused.” (Docket #12- 2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).