Seventh Circuit· 7/20/2004

Kevin A. Conner v. Daniel McBride Superintendent

Citations

375 F.3d 643
2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 15414
2004 WL 1609325

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that such arguments come down to a matter of degrees, which are ill-suited to judicial second-guessing
concluding Conner had failed to demonstrate that the jury would not have convicted him of murder even if an instruction on sudden heat had been given
noting that such arguments come down to a matter of degrees, which are ill-suited to judicial second-guessing
considering, under the totality test, the reliability of a confession to support a conclusion that the confession was voluntary
considering, under the totality test, the reliability of a confession to support a conclusion that the confession was voluntary
internal 2Recall that Abt raised only one claim on his direct appeal: that he should have been allowed to withdraw his plea because he was “confused.” (Docket #12- 2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Kanne, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

76 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.