Skip to main content
· 10/22/1984

Computerized Radiological Services, Inc. v. Syntex Corp.

Citations

  • 595 F. Supp. 1495
  • 40 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 49
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22588

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Even though an exclusive remedy is stricken because it fails of its essential purpose, that does not mean that all limitations must be stricken.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLAUGHLIN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.