Skip to main content
· 11/27/1989

USM Corp. v. Arthur D. Little Systems, Inc.

Citations

  • 546 N.E.2d 888
  • 28 Mass. App. Ct. 108
  • 10 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 327
  • 1989 Mass. App. LEXIS 666

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that contract for “turnkey” computer system was “good” under Mass G.L. c. 106, § 2-102
  • holding that seller’s overly optimistic statements to buyer regarding efficacy of turnkey computer system to meet buyer’s needs did not amount to “unfair or deceptive act” under Mass.G.L. c. 93 A
  • suggesting that failure to disclose information that would influence a buyer’s decision to enter into a commercial transaction may be “deceptive”
  • using “conformity with accepted methods within the business community” as one factor in concluding that there was no Chapter 93A violation
  • contract for computer system involving both sale of goods and delivery of services governed by UCC
  • contract for computer system involving both sale of goods and delivery of services governed by UCC

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Smith, Fine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.