Traxler v. PPG Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that consumer 17 plaintiff and manufacturer defendant were not in privity because plaintiff merely stated the 18 legal conclusion that it is an intended third-party beneficiary with no other specific 19 allegations
• “California [plaintiffs] cannot state a claim for implied warranty of merchantability absent privity of contract.”
• “Rule 9(b)’s particularity requirement may be relaxed when certain information is solely within the defendant’s knowledge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.
  N.D. California· 2018-03-05· cited 65×
• In re FCA US LLC Monostable Electronic Gearshift Litigation
  E.D. Michigan· 2017-11-15· cited 28×

Cites

71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Papasan v. Allain
  Supreme Court· 1986-07-01· cited 9,423×
• Green v. Mansour
  Supreme Court· 1986-01-27· cited 1,617×
• Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1984-07-25· cited 548×
• Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company, a Michigan and Indiana Corporation v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation
  Sixth Circuit· 1984-09-28· cited 425×
• Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-07-24· cited 382×
• Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-04-24· cited 289×
• A & M PRODUCE CO. v. FMC Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 1982-08-27· cited 259×
• Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1954-04-16· cited 257×
• Chemtrol Adhesives, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1989-04-19· cited 247×
• Kassab v. Soya
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-10-11· cited 208×
• Philip H. Sanderson v. Hca-The Healthcare Company Columbia Health Care Corporation Hospital Corporation of America and Healthtrust Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 2006-05-12· cited 198×
• American Suzuki Motor Corp. v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1995-08-23· cited 112×
• Touchet Valley Grain Growers, Inc. v. Opp & Seibold General Construction, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-06-18· cited 99×
• In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigation
  C.D. California· 2010-11-30· cited 87×
• In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.
  S.D. Ohio· 2012-07-19· cited 85×
• Heller v. U. S. Suzuki Motor Corp.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1985-03-26· cited 77×
• Bianca Ellis v. Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
  Fourth Circuit· 2012-11-02· cited 74×
• Gilbert Financial Corp v. Steelform Contracting Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1978-06-23· cited 71×