Kearney & Trecker Corp. v. Master Engraving Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• asserting that \commonly-applied formula\ in breach-of-warranty cases is difference between value of goods accepted and value of goods if delivered as promised
• asserting that “commonly-applied formula” in breaeh-of-warranty cases is difference between value of goods accepted and value of goods if delivered as promised
• enforcing an exclusion where the seller made at least thirteen attempts to service a de fective machine
• enforcing an exclusion where the seller made at least thirteen attempts to service a de fective machine
• declining to impose a tort duty between businesses for damages that were not “highly unusual or unforeseeable” in the kind of transaction covered by the parties’ contract, and quoting Ch atlos Sys., Inc. v. Nat’l Cash Register Corp., 635 F.2d 1081, 1087 (3d Cir.1980)
• “For certain sellers, exposure to liability for consequential damages could drastically affect the conduct of their business, causing them to increase their prices or limit their markets.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).