Triangle Underwriters, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc. And Honeywell Information Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that contractual limitation of compensation to the purchase price provides indicia of a sale of goods, not services
• concluding that computer system containing custom soft-ware was governed by U.C.C. Article Two
• stating that a bill that does not include services indicates a contract general trend [is] to view such mixed contracts as governed by the UCC.”
• noting that “the district court was justified in concluding, as a matter of law, that the contract was one for a sale of goods” on a motion to dismiss
• distinguishing allegations of “misrepresentations and con-cealments made after the parties had entered into a contractual relationship with each other”
• noting that “New York and other jurisdictions hold that attempts by the seller to remedy defects giving rise to the cause of action do not toll the U.C.C.’s four-year period of limitations” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).