Skip to main content
· 5/19/2000

Pierce v. Catalina Yachts, Inc.

Citations

  • 2 P.3d 618
  • 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 737
  • 2000 Alas. LEXIS 50
  • 2000 WL 641060

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that one-year limited repair warranty “falls within the definition” of a written warranty under section 2301(6)(B) of the Act
  • concluding that one-year limited repair warranty “falls within the definition” of a written warranty under section 2301(6)(B) of the Act
  • stating that “the legal issue of unconscionability hinges on the totality of the circumstances”
  • stating that Athe legal issue of unconscionability hinges on the totality of the circumstances@
  • holding unconscionable sailboat manufacturer's warranty in favor of buyers
  • “Courts are more likely to find unconscionability when a consumer is involved, when there is a disparity in bargaining power, and when the consequential damages clause is on a pre-printed form”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matthews, Eastaugh, Fabe, Bryner, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.