Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Wallace

Citations

  • 724 A.2d 916
  • 555 Pa. 397
  • 1999 Pa. LEXIS 140

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a failure to raise a claim “in the PCRA petitions presented to the PCRA court” waives the claim for purposes of appellate review
  • holding that a failure to raise a claim “in the PCRA petitions presented to the PCRA court” waives the claim for purposes of appellate review
  • concluding that a petitioner’s failure “to raise [a claim] in the PCRA petitions presented to the PCRA Court” made the claim “not eligible for appellate review”
  • stating that issues not raised in the PCRA petition and presented to the PCRA court are not eligible for appellate review
  • noting that, in the context of a properly pleaded and supported claim of ineffectiveness, the merits of the underlying claim may be addressed and waiver avoided
  • noting that, in the context of a properly pleaded and supported claim of ineffectiveness, the merits of the underlying claim may be addressed and waiver avoided

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.