Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 6/23/1986

Commonwealth v. Albrecht

Citations

511 A.2d 764
510 Pa. 603
1986 Pa. LEXIS 817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an appellant’s failure to show prejudice rendered meritless his argument that the trial court erred by not sequestering a Commonwealth expert witness
finding sufficient evidence of specific intent to kill based on defendant's numerous physical assaults on his wife and his threats, heard by others to kill his wife and burn their house down
finding sufficient evidence of specific intent to kill based on defendant’s numerous physical assaults on his wife and his threats, heard by others to kill his wife and burn their house down
defendant not entitled to relief absent showing of specific damage occurring as result of violation of sequestration order
Commonwealth’s case against defendant based on showing numerous acts of violence between defendant and victim; defendant’s intent to kill inferred from previous physical assaults and threats

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Hutchinson, Zappala, Papadakos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.