Skip to main content
· 5/13/2011

Commonwealth v. Ousley

Citations

  • 21 A.3d 1238
  • 2011 Pa. Super. 103
  • 2011 Pa. Super. LEXIS 609
  • 2011 WL 1834453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a legality of sentence claim not raised in a PCRA petition is waived
  • holding that substantive issues not included in an original PCRA petition, or a court approved amended PCRA petition, cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
  • holding that issues not raised in a PCRA petition cannot be considered on appeal
  • holding that issues not raised in a PCRA petition cannot be considered on appeal
  • holding that issues not raised in a PCRA petition cannot be considered on appeal
  • holding that issues not raised in a PCRA petition cannot be considered on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens, P.J., Lazarus and Platt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.