· 5/13/2011
Commonwealth v. Ousley
Citations
- 21 A.3d 1238
- 2011 Pa. Super. 103
- 2011 Pa. Super. LEXIS 609
- 2011 WL 1834453
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a legality of sentence claim not raised in a PCRA petition is waived
- holding that substantive issues not included in an original PCRA petition, or a court approved amended PCRA petition, cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
- holding that issues not raised in a PCRA petition cannot be considered on appeal
- holding that issues not raised in a PCRA petition cannot be considered on appeal
- holding that issues not raised in a PCRA petition cannot be considered on appeal
- holding that issues not raised in a PCRA petition cannot be considered on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stevens, P.J., Lazarus and Platt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.