Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Banks

Citations

  • 656 A.2d 467
  • 540 Pa. 143
  • 1995 Pa. LEXIS 197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that where there are no disputed factual issues, a PCRA hearing is not necessary
  • stating that, “[t]o be eligible for PCRA relief, [an a]pellant must establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that his conviction or sentence resulted from one or more of the enumerated errors or defects found in section 9543(a)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, C.J., and Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille and Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.