Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Walls

Citations

  • 993 A.2d 289
  • 2010 Pa. Super. 54
  • 2010 Pa. Super. LEXIS 312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for evidentiary hearing where defendant suffered from a significant hearing impairment and counsel failed to secure an interpreter; citing Strickland prejudice prong
  • remanding for an evidentiary hearing by the PCRA court where the resolution of genuine issues of material fact would affect a finding of trial counsel’s ineffectiveness
  • remanding for evidentiary hearing where appellant’s ineffectiveness claim, “[a]t a minimum, … raise[d] genuine issues of material fact which [could not] be resolved on the existing record.”
  • stating, \It is within the PCRA court's discretion to decline to hold a hearing if the petitioner's claim is patently frivolous and has no support either in the record or other evidence.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Shogan, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.