Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Buehl

Citations

  • 658 A.2d 771
  • 540 Pa. 493
  • 1995 Pa. LEXIS 323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial counsel may have wished to avoid emphasizing what might have gone relatively unnoticed by the jury, and thus possessed a reasonable basis for failing to request an instruction
  • counsel not ineffective for failing to object to references to defendant's making of death threats, attempt to hire out for murder, and possession of illegal weapons; prejudice was minimal
  • three members of a divided court interpreted the PCRA to require a defendant claiming ineffectiveness of counsel to meet a more demanding standard of prejudice than if he had raised this issue on direct appeal
  • three members of a divided court interpreted the PCRA to require a defendant claiming ineffectiveness of counsel to meet a more demanding standard of prejudice than if he had raised this issue on direct appeal
  • prosecution's failure to reveal potential bias of witnesses who had pending criminal charges did not entitle defendant to a new trial where there was sufficient other evidence to support the conviction, outside of those witnesses' testimony
  • PCRA court’s vacation of death sentence, based on its conclusion this Court erred when it failed to vacate sentence on direct appeal, was improper; there is no authority “which permits the Courts of Common Pleas of this Commonwealth to overrule the decisions of this Court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, C.J., and Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille and Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.