Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Tucker

Citations

  • 143 A.3d 955
  • 2016 Pa. Super. 157
  • 2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 395
  • 2016 WL 4035602

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claim was waived where appellant waited until the completion of direct examination and cross-examination of the subject witness and the next witness before raising objection
  • holding that evidence was sufficient to support attempted murder conviction of victim where shots missed victim’s head and victim was hit in the leg
  • holding that claim was waived where appellant waited until the completion of direct examination and cross-examination of the subject witness and the next witness before raising objection
  • holding appellant waived claim where he waited until after direct and cross-examination of the subject witness, and after the next witness’s testimony, before raising objection
  • stating that an illegal sentence must be vacated and requires remand for resentencing
  • affirming the defendant’s conviction but concluding that the illegal sentence must be vacated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Dubow, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.