Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1/24/2020

Com. v. Pacheco, D.

Citations

227 A.3d 358
2020 Pa. Super. 14

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, “an individual maintains a legitimate expectation of privacy in the record of his[, or her,] physical movements as captured through real-time CSLI”
finding a substantial question where the sentencing court, inter alia, sought to “send a message” and hold the defendant “accountable for the heroin epidemic”
deeming a claim waived where the appellant waited until after the witness was excused before lodging an objection
rejecting Commonwealth’s waiver claim where Appellant raised and preserved challenge to warrantless collection of CSLI evidence from his cell phone provider in motion to suppress and supporting briefs
“It is well-settled that where a sentencing court is informed by a PSI, it is presumed that the court is aware of all appropriate sentencing factors and considerations, and that where the court has been so informed, its discretion should not be disturbed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kunselman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Com. v. Pacheco, D.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.