Commonwealth v. Cappellini

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that total confinement under Section 9771(c)(2
• holding that total confinement under Section 9771(c)(2
• holding appellant’s continued drug use, combined with his resistance to treatment and supervision, was sufficient for court to determine appellant would likely commit another crime if not incarcerated
• holding appellant’s continued drug use as well as his resistance to treatment and supervision, was sufficient for court to determine appellant would likely commit another crime if not incarcerated
• stating that an allegation that the trial court failed to state sufficient reasons on the record for the imposition of the sentence raises a substantial question for our review
• stating that “continued drug use, combined with his resistance to treatment and supervision, is enough to make a determination that, unless incarcerated, appellant would in all likelihood commit another crime”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).