· 11/17/2006
Commonwealth v. Leverette
Citations
- 911 A.2d 998
- 2006 Pa. Super. 331
- 2006 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4086
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining ineffectiveness claims may be raised on direct appeal only in certain circumstances which are not present here
- explaining ineffectiveness claims may be raised on direct appeal only if: (1) appellant raised claim(s) in post-sentence motion; (2) evidentiary hearing was held on claim(s); and (3) record devoted to claim(s) has been developed
- explaining ineffectiveness claims may be raised on direct appeal only if: (1) appellant raised claim(s) in post-sentence motion; (2) evidentiary hearing was held on claim(s); and (3) record devoted to claim(s) has been developed
- “If no statutory authorization exists for a particular sentence, that sentence is illegal and subject to correction.”
- “If no statutory authorization exists for a particular sentence, that sentence is illegal and subject to correction.”
- “if no statutory authorization exists for a particular sentence, that sentence is illegal”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lally-Green, Gantman, Popovich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.