Skip to main content
· 11/17/2006

Commonwealth v. Leverette

Citations

  • 911 A.2d 998
  • 2006 Pa. Super. 331
  • 2006 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4086

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining ineffectiveness claims may be raised on direct appeal only in certain circumstances which are not present here
  • explaining ineffectiveness claims may be raised on direct appeal only if: (1) appellant raised claim(s) in post-sentence motion; (2) evidentiary hearing was held on claim(s); and (3) record devoted to claim(s) has been developed
  • explaining ineffectiveness claims may be raised on direct appeal only if: (1) appellant raised claim(s) in post-sentence motion; (2) evidentiary hearing was held on claim(s); and (3) record devoted to claim(s) has been developed
  • “If no statutory authorization exists for a particular sentence, that sentence is illegal and subject to correction.”
  • “If no statutory authorization exists for a particular sentence, that sentence is illegal and subject to correction.”
  • “if no statutory authorization exists for a particular sentence, that sentence is illegal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lally-Green, Gantman, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.