Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Miller

Citations

  • 35 A.3d 1206
  • 613 Pa. 584
  • 2012 Pa. LEXIS 148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellant’s “acquittal of the predicate offense of robbery does not necessitate the vacatur of his conviction of second-degree murder”
  • concluding that the “[a]ppellee's acquittal of the predicate offense of robbery does not necessitate the vacatur of his conviction of second-degree murder”
  • holding that inconsistent verdicts are allowed to stand where the evidence is sufficient to support the conviction
  • holding inconsistent jury verdicts of guilt on second-degree murder count but acquittal on predicate robbery charge did not require vacating murder conviction
  • reaffirming that “even where two verdicts are logically inconsistent, such inconsistency alone cannot be grounds for a new trial or for reversal”
  • concluding “an acquittal cannot be interpreted as a specific finding in relation to some of the evidence,” and “even where two verdicts are logically inconsistent, such inconsistency alone cannot be grounds for a new trial or for reversal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Todd, McCaffery, Melvin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.