Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/6/2016

Commonwealth v. Kennedy

Citations

151 A.3d 1117
2016 Pa. Super. 273
2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 734

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a police officer could offer a lay opinion concerning the trajectory of bullet based on rods she placed in bullet holes
concluding that the defendant was not entitled to introduce evidence of truthfulness in light of testimony by two witnesses who contradicted the defendant’s testimony
concluding that the defendant was not entitled to introduce evidence of truthfulness in light of testimony by two witnesses who contradicted the defendant’s testimony
holding an officer’s opinion concerning the trajectory of bullet based on rods she placed in bullet holes was an admissible lay opinion
stating it is well established that “a jury may properly infer malice and specific intent from the fact that a victim was shot multiple times”
finding claim waived where review of issue raised was dependent upon materials not included in the certified record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olson, Ott, Musmanno

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.