Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Triplett

Citations

  • 341 A.2d 62
  • 462 Pa. 244
  • 1975 Pa. LEXIS 876

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • statements ruled inadmissible on motion to suppress may not be used to impeach defendant who testifies at trial
  • statements of a defendant declared inadmissible by suppression court cannot be used for impeachment purposes; contra Harris v. New York, 401 U.S. 222, 91 S.Ct. 643, 28 L.Ed.2d 1 (1971)
  • concurring opinion by Pomeroy, J.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

82 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.