Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2/18/1992
Messenger v. Messenger
Citations
- 827 P.2d 865
- 63 O.B.A.J. 532
- 1992 OK 27
- 1992 Okla. LEXIS 33
- 1992 WL 32835
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Messenger also held that support alimony payments were not subject to modification on the basis of after-enacted legislation.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ala, Hodges, Simms, Doolin, Hargrave, Kauger, Summers, Lavender, Wilson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Akin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1998-10-13· cited 142×
- Bivins v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1996-01-16· cited 140×
- Gaylord Entertainment Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1998-04-14· cited 134×
- Starkey v. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2013-06-25· cited 125×
- Lockhart v. LoosenSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1997-08-21· cited 119×
- Brock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1997-10-14· cited 102×
- Johnson v. Board of Governors of Registered DentistsSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1996-05-02· cited 98×
- Strelecki v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1994-03-23· cited 91×
- Rodgers v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1994-04-15· cited 91×
- Booth v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2003-05-13· cited 79×
- Fent v. Oklahoma Nat. Gas, a Div. of OneokSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1994-10-04· cited 63×
- State ex rel. Macy v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1999-06-01· cited 61×
- Stork v. StorkSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1995-06-14· cited 45×
- Mocnik v. MocnikSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1992-08-18· cited 40×
- Manning v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1994-06-13· cited 39×
- Flandermeyer v. BonnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2006-11-21· cited 38×
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1994-04-13· cited 34×
- Holleyman v. HolleymanSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2003-10-14· cited 34×
- Halliburton Oil Producing Co. v. GrothausSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1998-11-03· cited 32×
- Union Oil Co. v. Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1996-03-20· cited 22×
Cites
65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 14,284×
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 6,903×
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 3,921×
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-02-20· cited 1,583×
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 1,364×
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court· 1981-06-26· cited 1,052×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1975-10-08· cited 338×
- Raven v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-12-24· cited 273×
- State v. SantiagoHawaii Supreme Court· 1971-12-29· cited 256×
- People v. DisbrowCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-02-06· cited 229×
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-10-24· cited 209×
- Commonwealth v. TriplettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-05-13· cited 139×
- Draper v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1980-12-23· cited 123×
- Fair School Finance Council of Oklahoma, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1987-11-25· cited 119×
- McKeever Drilling Co. v. EgbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1934-12-27· cited 117×
- Reeves v. AgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1989-02-24· cited 113×
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1985-09-24· cited 109×
- Reherman v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1984-04-05· cited 104×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.