Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Strong

Citations

  • 836 A.2d 884
  • 575 Pa. 433
  • 2003 Pa. LEXIS 2213

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that any error in permitting the jury to view evidence during deliberations in violation of Pa.R.E. 646 is subject to a harmless error analysis
  • holding that it was error to submit a diagram to the jury because “it was not offered as an exhibit, counsel for appellant was not asked or obliged to offer objections, and no ruling on the admissibility was ever made”
  • explaining “[t]he diagram had little value in undermining the multiple eyewitness identifications that it was appellant who shot into the car”
  • applying a harmless error analysis to a violation of a rule of criminal procedure and collecting cases
  • applying a harmless error analysis to a violation of a rule of criminal procedure and collecting cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Lamb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.